THMR vs VOO

THMR vs VOO

Which is better, THMR or VOO?

Tactical Allocation against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 79.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTHMRVOO
Expense Ratio1.10%0.03%Best
AUM$44M$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings52506
YTD Return+4.11%+13.57%Best
1Y Return-+17.55%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Top 10 Weight79.4%37.9%Best
Fund FamilyThor Financial TechnologiesVanguard (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
StyleTactical AllocationLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 9, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

THMR vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

THMR vs VOO Performance

THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF (THMR) is an ETF from Thor Financial Technologies and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, THMR is up 4.11% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

THMR charges 1.10% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $110 vs $3 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, THMR currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

THMR already in VOO20.4%
VOO already in THMR32.0%

20.4% of THMR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 32.0% of VOO's money is in holdings THMR also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

9 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in THMR and 504 in VOO, against full books of 52 and 506.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 490 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for THMR (67.7% of the fund), and 11 for THMR that do not appear in VOO (79.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in THMRWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp4.69%8.09%3.40%
AAPLApple, Inc2.18%7.04%4.86%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp2.08%5.70%3.62%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.26%3.85%2.59%
XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd2.96%1.01%1.95%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.29%1.38%0.91%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C1.20%2.40%1.20%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.45%1.90%0.45%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc2.28%0.65%1.63%

32.0% of VOO is already inside THMR.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

THMRVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, THMR or VOO?

THMR has an expense ratio of 1.10% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $107 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between THMR and VOO?

32.0% of VOO's money is in holdings THMR also owns. 32.0% of VOO's is in holdings THMR also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in THMR and 504 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, THMR or VOO?

THMR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than THMR?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 79.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.