WBIF vs ZAP
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Which is better, WBIF or ZAP?
Each has led over a different period.
ZAP has a lower expense ratio. WBIF led over 1Y, ZAP over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | WBIF | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.65% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $440M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.74% |
| Holdings | 152 | 94 |
| YTD Return | +14.87%Best | +6.45% |
| 1Y Return | +15.37%Best | +2.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.35% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.01% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4%Best | 15.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4% | -13.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $12,638 | $13,487Best |
| Fund Family | WBI Investments | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2014 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
WBIF vs ZAP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
WBIF vs ZAP Performance
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is an ETF from WBI Investments and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year WBIF returned +15.37% while ZAP returned +2.72%. Year to date, WBIF is up 14.87% versus a gain of 6.45% for ZAP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 12.4% for WBIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for WBIF and -13.0% for ZAP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
WBIF charges 1.65% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $165 vs $50 annually, a gap of $115 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, WBIF currently yields 0.00% against 1.74% for ZAP.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.8% of ZAP's money is in holdings WBIF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for WBIF, our book for it covers 83.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in WBIF and 45 in ZAP, against full books of 152 and 94.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in WBIF | Weight in ZAP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENSEnersys | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of WBIF and ZAP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, WBIF or ZAP?
WBIF has an expense ratio of 1.65% while ZAP charges 0.50%. ZAP is the cheaper option, by $115 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, WBIF or ZAP?
Over the past year WBIF returned +15.37% vs +2.72% for ZAP, so WBIF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), WBIF annualized +13.89% vs +18.08% for ZAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, WBIF or ZAP?
ZAP has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 12.4% for WBIF. Worst drawdown: WBIF -16.4% vs ZAP -13.0%.
Should I hold both WBIF and ZAP?
WBIF and ZAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, WBIF or ZAP?
WBIF yields 0.00% while ZAP yields 1.74%, so ZAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZAP better than WBIF?
ZAP has a lower expense ratio. WBIF led over 1Y, ZAP over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.