AIBF vs QQQ

AIBF vs QQQ

Which is better, AIBF or QQQ?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. AIBF is less concentrated, with 34.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: AIBF

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAIBFQQQ
Expense Ratio0.40%0.18%Best
AUM$230M$506.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.42%
Holdings101321
YTD Return+1.45%+19.30%Best
1Y Return-+22.47%
3Y Return (annualized)-+26.18%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.42%
Top 10 Weight34.4%Best46.7%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionSep 22, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AIBF vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AIBF vs QQQ Performance

iShares Future AI Beneficiaries ETF (AIBF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, AIBF is up 1.45% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AIBF charges 0.40% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $18 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIBF currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

AIBF already in QQQ31.0%
QQQ already in AIBF22.5%

31.0% of AIBF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 22.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings AIBF also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

22 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in AIBF and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 101 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 70 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for AIBF (73.8% of the fund), and 76 for AIBF that do not appear in QQQ (66.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AIBFWeight in QQQDifference
WMTWalmart, Inc.3.95%2.11%1.84%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.38%3.26%0.88%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc2.02%3.05%1.03%
TSLATesla Inc2.02%2.82%0.80%
PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc3.43%1.35%2.08%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies2.02%2.70%0.68%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc2.67%1.13%1.54%
AMGNAmgen Inc.1.80%0.95%0.85%
PEPPepsico Inc.1.63%0.72%0.91%
GILDGilead Sciences1.47%0.77%0.70%

31.0% of AIBF is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AIBFQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AIBF or QQQ?

AIBF has an expense ratio of 0.40% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AIBF and QQQ?

31.0% of AIBF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 22.5% of QQQ's is in holdings AIBF also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in AIBF and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, AIBF or QQQ?

AIBF yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than AIBF?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. AIBF is less concentrated, with 34.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.