AIBF vs VYM

AIBF vs VYM

Which is better, AIBF or VYM?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.4%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAIBFVYM
Expense Ratio0.40%0.04%Best
AUM$230M$78.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.37%
Holdings101608
YTD Return+1.45%+11.83%Best
1Y Return-+15.96%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.60%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.51%
Top 10 Weight34.4%25.8%Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Value
InceptionSep 22, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AIBF vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AIBF vs VYM Performance

iShares Future AI Beneficiaries ETF (AIBF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, AIBF is up 1.45% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AIBF charges 0.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $4 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIBF currently yields 0.00% against 2.37% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

AIBF already in VYM52.2%
VYM already in AIBF25.6%

52.2% of AIBF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 25.6% of VYM's money is in holdings AIBF also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

50 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in AIBF and 602 in VYM, against full books of 101 and 608.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 524 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for AIBF (73.4% of the fund), and 50 for AIBF that do not appear in VYM (47.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AIBFWeight in VYMDifference
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common3.52%2.58%0.94%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.3.79%1.83%1.96%
KOCoca Cola Co.3.14%1.39%1.75%
PGProcter & Gamble Company3.08%1.36%1.72%
MRKMerck & Company Inc2.89%1.47%1.42%
UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated2.66%1.42%1.24%
HDHome Depot Inc/The2.67%1.32%1.35%
RTX:MXUnited Technologies Corp.2.40%1.13%1.27%
LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares2.06%0.91%1.15%
AMGNAmgen Inc.1.80%0.86%0.94%

52.2% of AIBF is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AIBFVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AIBF or VYM?

AIBF has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AIBF and VYM?

52.2% of AIBF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 25.6% of VYM's is in holdings AIBF also owns. They hold 50 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in AIBF and 602 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, AIBF or VYM?

AIBF yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than AIBF?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.