LCO vs QQQ
LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, LCO or QQQ?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCO | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.13% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $58M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 89 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +6.69% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Fund Family | LOGIQ Capital LLC | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jan 8, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
LCO vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LCO vs QQQ Performance
LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) is an ETF from LOGIQ Capital LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, LCO is up 6.69% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCO charges 1.13% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $18 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCO currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 34.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings LCO also owns.
Stated as a floor: for LCO, our book for it covers 92.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in LCO and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 89 and 321.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LCO | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.18% | 8.33% | 6.15% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.83% | 5.02% | 2.19% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.77% | 4.07% | 2.30% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.38% | 3.26% | 0.88% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.37% | 2.85% | 0.48% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.26% | 2.64% | 0.38% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc | 0.64% | 4.17% | 3.53% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.44% | 1.80% | 0.36% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 1.83% | 0.36% | 1.47% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 0.91% | 0.97% | 0.06% |
34.3% of QQQ is already inside LCO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCO or QQQ?
LCO has an expense ratio of 1.13% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between LCO and QQQ?
At least 34.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings LCO also owns. Our book for LCO is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in LCO and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCO or QQQ?
LCO yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than LCO?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.