LCO vs VTI
LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LCO or VTI?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.13% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $58M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 89 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +6.69% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Fund Family | LOGIQ Capital LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 8, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
LCO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LCO vs VTI Performance
LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) is an ETF from LOGIQ Capital LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, LCO is up 6.69% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCO charges 1.13% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $3 annually, a gap of $110 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCO currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 20.6% of VTI's money is in holdings LCO also owns.
Stated as a floor: for LCO, our book for it covers 92.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and LCO share little of their money.
43 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in LCO and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 89 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LCO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.18% | 6.88% | 4.70% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.77% | 3.41% | 1.64% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.37% | 2.12% | 0.25% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.83% | 1.46% | 1.37% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.38% | 1.70% | 0.68% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 3.44% | 0.31% | 3.13% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.26% | 0.51% | 1.75% |
| BTUPeabody Energy Corp | 2.07% | 0.00% | 2.07% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.44% | 0.55% | 0.89% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 1.83% | 0.10% | 1.73% |
20.6% of VTI is already inside LCO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCO or VTI?
LCO has an expense ratio of 1.13% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $110 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between LCO and VTI?
At least 20.6% of VTI's money is in holdings LCO also owns. Our book for LCO is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 43 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in LCO and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCO or VTI?
LCO yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LCO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.