LCO vs VOO
LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LCO or VOO?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCO | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.13% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $58M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 89 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +6.69% | +13.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.55% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Fund Family | LOGIQ Capital LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 8, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
LCO vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LCO vs VOO Performance
LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) is an ETF from LOGIQ Capital LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, LCO is up 6.69% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCO charges 1.13% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $3 annually, a gap of $110 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCO currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 23.3% of VOO's money is in holdings LCO also owns.
Stated as a floor: for LCO, our book for it covers 92.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VOO and LCO share little of their money.
30 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in LCO and 504 in VOO, against full books of 89 and 506.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LCO | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.18% | 8.09% | 5.91% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.77% | 3.85% | 2.08% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.37% | 2.40% | 0.03% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.83% | 1.64% | 1.19% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.38% | 1.90% | 0.48% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 3.44% | 0.35% | 3.09% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.26% | 0.67% | 1.59% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.44% | 0.65% | 0.79% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 1.83% | 0.11% | 1.72% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc | 0.64% | 1.16% | 0.52% |
23.3% of VOO is already inside LCO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCO or VOO?
LCO has an expense ratio of 1.13% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $110 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between LCO and VOO?
At least 23.3% of VOO's money is in holdings LCO also owns. Our book for LCO is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in LCO and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCO or VOO?
LCO yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LCO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.